PEPPOL-COMMON-R057 A Dutch establishment number under scheme 0217 should be exactly twelve digits

"identifier": { "schemeId": "0217", "value": "000012345678" }

{
  "rule": "PEPPOL-COMMON-R057",
  "field": "BT-29",
  "severity": "warning",
  "message": "The Seller identifier (BT-29) is \"12345678\" under scheme \"0217\", which identifies the Dutch establishment number (vestigingsnummer). A value in that scheme must be exactly twelve digits, and this one is not. The establishment number identifies one branch of a company in the Dutch trade register, and it is twelve digits where the company's KVK number is eight. An eight-digit value here is almost always the KVK number, which belongs under scheme 0106. As an electronic address, 0217 is also refused by PEPPOL-EN16931-CL008: it left Peppol's participant scheme list in the same release. Peppol flags this one as a warning rather than a rejection, so the document will be delivered — but a wrong identifier is delivered to the wrong place, or to nowhere. Peppol added this rule in BIS 3.0.21 as a warning, to give senders time to correct their data, and has said the Dutch identifier rules become fatal in a later release. This is a Peppol BIS Billing 3.0 profile rule: it applies because profile is \"peppol-bis-3\". It does not apply to the en16931, xrechnung-ubl or xrechnung-cii profiles, whose validators will accept the same document.",
  "fix": "Correct seller.identifier, or change its scheme identifier if the value belongs to a different register. A failing check digit or length almost always means a digit was transposed, dropped or added in transcription — compare it against the source register rather than re-typing it.",
  "example": "\"identifier\": { \"schemeId\": \"0217\", \"value\": \"000012345678\" }",
  "xpath": "/ubl:Invoice/cac:AccountingSupplierParty/cac:Party/cac:PartyIdentification/cbc:ID",
  "docsUrl": "https://attestwire.com/rules/PEPPOL-COMMON-R057"
}