BR-DE-17 XRechnung restricts the invoice type code (BT-3) to 326, 380, 381, 384, 389, 875, 876 and 877 from UNTDID 1001, but "999" was supplied
XRechnung restricts the invoice type code (BT-3) to 326, 380, 381, 384, 389, 875, 876 and 877 from UNTDID 1001, but "999" was supplied. The wider UNTDID list is legal under core EN 16931 and will be rejected by a German receiving portal.
This rule is implemented and its error payload below is real, but the long-form write-up — normative text, worked example, divergence note — is not written yet. Everything the library knows about this rule is on this page. Ask and we will prioritise it.
- Business term
BT-3- Severity
fatal
What the library returns
The exact object in result.errors when this rule fires.
Generated by running @attestwire/en16931, not transcribed:
{
"rule": "BR-DE-17",
"field": "BT-3",
"severity": "fatal",
"message": "XRechnung restricts the invoice type code (BT-3) to 326, 380, 381, 384, 389, 875, 876 and 877 from UNTDID 1001, but \"999\" was supplied. The wider UNTDID list is legal under core EN 16931 and will be rejected by a German receiving portal.",
"fix": "Use \"380\" for a commercial invoice, \"381\" for a credit note, \"384\" for a corrected invoice (and then also supply the preceding invoice reference, BR-DE-26), \"326\" for a partial invoice, \"389\" for self-billing.",
"example": "\"invoiceTypeCode\": \"380\"",
"xpath": "/ubl:Invoice/cbc:InvoiceTypeCode",
"docsUrl": "https://attestwire.com/rules/BR-DE-17"
}
xpath locates the element in the generated UBL document,
which is where a KoSIT or Peppol validator will report the same problem.
A passing value
"invoiceTypeCode": "380"The fix
Use "380" for a commercial invoice, "381" for a credit note, "384" for a corrected invoice (and then also supply the preceding invoice reference, BR-DE-26), "326" for a partial invoice, "389" for self-billing.