BR-CL-17 The VAT breakdown (BG-23) computed from your lines contains a VAT category code (BT-118) of "X", which is not in UNTDID 5305
The VAT breakdown (BG-23) computed from your lines contains a VAT category code (BT-118) of "X", which is not in UNTDID 5305. The breakdown categories are taken straight from the line categories (BT-151), so this is the document-level consequence of the same bad code — KoSIT reports it against both elements, and so do we.
This rule is implemented and its error payload below is real, but the long-form write-up — normative text, worked example, divergence note — is not written yet. Everything the library knows about this rule is on this page. Ask and we will prioritise it.
- Business term
BT-118- Severity
fatal
What the library returns
The exact object in result.errors when this rule fires.
Generated by running @attestwire/en16931, not transcribed:
{
"rule": "BR-CL-17",
"field": "BT-118",
"severity": "fatal",
"message": "The VAT breakdown (BG-23) computed from your lines contains a VAT category code (BT-118) of \"X\", which is not in UNTDID 5305. The breakdown categories are taken straight from the line categories (BT-151), so this is the document-level consequence of the same bad code — KoSIT reports it against both elements, and so do we.",
"fix": "Correct the offending line's vatCategory. The breakdown is always computed from the lines, so there is nothing to fix at document level.",
"example": "\"vatCategory\": \"S\", \"vatRate\": 19",
"xpath": "/ubl:Invoice/cac:TaxTotal/cac:TaxSubtotal/cac:TaxCategory/cbc:ID",
"docsUrl": "https://attestwire.com/rules/BR-CL-17"
}
xpath locates the element in the generated UBL document,
which is where a KoSIT or Peppol validator will report the same problem.
A passing value
"vatCategory": "S", "vatRate": 19The fix
Correct the offending line's vatCategory. The breakdown is always computed from the lines, so there is nothing to fix at document level.